All Solutions

Solution

Breaking the Honing Bottleneck

Stone selection testing transformed a struggling cylinder liner line, from erratic 5-minute cycles and 270 liners per shift to consistent 55-second cycles.

honinggrindingautomotivequality-controlelastic-modulus 2 min read

The Challenge

For years, the Cummins engine plant in Darlington struggled with chronic honing problems on cylinder liners. Bores glazed unpredictably, retraction marks appeared, and cycle times dragged from the target of one minute out to five minutes. The honing operation became a production bottleneck, limiting output to just 270 liners per shift.

The problems cascaded: glazed bores caused sizing issues, operators compensated with higher honing pressures, and those pressures split the rubber bushes in the hydraulic fixtures. When glazing occurred, stones might be changed at any point in their life, sometimes after only half an hour, driving up rejection rates and abrasive costs. Engineers from both the abrasive supplier and machine tool company visited Darlington repeatedly over the years, but no one solved the problem permanently.

The Solution

A GrindoSonic sales engineer introduced the technology to Cummins, and the plant decided to characterize their honing stones. Testing a batch of 1,800 stones, all nominally the same GC-320-J-VTNS grade, revealed a 300-point spread in GrindoSonic readings (800 to 1100), equivalent to six hardness grades within a single “grade” designation.

Controlled honing tests with stones grouped by GrindoSonic number told the story clearly:

The hardest stones (reading 800) glazed and extended cycle times. The softest stones (reading 1100) eroded so rapidly they wore down to the steel shoe after just 35 liners, sometimes requiring replacement after mere minutes. But stones in the middle range (850-950) performed well: consistent 55-second cycles, good texture and surface finish, and tool life extending to 3,000 liners.

The mystery of random failures was solved. When hard and soft stones were mixed in the same set, the soft stones wore faster, leaving the hard stones proud of the honing head guides, causing the glazing on retraction that had plagued production for years.

Key takeaway: A single “grade” of honing stone concealed six hardness grades, a 300-point spread that explained years of random failures, and GrindoSonic classification eliminated the problem overnight.

Results

By specifying a GrindoSonic spread of 850-950 for incoming stones, Cummins transformed their honing operation. During one full day’s observation with properly selected stones, 120 liners were honed within the hour on a two-spindle machine, each completing in 55 seconds with excellent texture and finish.

Carborundum initially resisted GrindoSonic specifications, but eventually achieved batches with fall-out rates down to 5%. Atlantic of West Germany guaranteed a 100-point spread and flew stones directly to Teesside for testing.

The same approach proved valuable for cam grinding wheels. Tracking E-modulus on over 100 wheels revealed that Norton had quietly changed their abrasive mix. When Cummins reverted to the original 23A series based on GrindoSonic verification, grinding times improved by 30 seconds and dressing frequency dropped by 50%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did honing stones from the same grade cause such inconsistent performance?
Testing 1,800 nominally identical GC-320-J-VTNS honing stones revealed a 300-point spread in GrindoSonic readings (800 to 1100), equivalent to six hardness grades within a single supplier grade. When hard and soft stones were mixed in the same set, soft stones wore faster, leaving hard stones proud of the honing head guides and causing glazing on retraction.
How did GrindoSonic testing solve the cylinder liner honing bottleneck?
By classifying each stone's elastic modulus before use, Cummins selected only stones in the 850-950 range and grouped them into narrow 10-point bands. This ensured uniform load distribution across all eight stones in a set, eliminating the random glazing, retraction marks, and cycle time variability that had plagued production for years.
What production improvements resulted from honing stone selection?
Cycle times dropped from an erratic 1-5 minutes to a consistent 55 seconds. Production increased from 270 liners per shift to over 500. Stone life extended to 3,000 liners, and the same GrindoSonic approach applied to cam grinding wheels reduced grinding times by 30 seconds and cut dressing frequency by 50%.

Ready to Get Started?

Contact us for a feasibility assessment or request sample testing.